ЮРИДИЧЕСКОЕ  ЗАКРЕПЛЕНИЕ   ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ  ПРИТЯЗАНИЙ  КИТАЯ  И  ФИЛИППИН   В  ЮЖНО-КИТАЙСКОМ  МОРЕ  ВО  ВТОРОЙ  ПОЛОВИНЕ  XX  ВЕКА: ВОПРОСЫ  НАЦИОНАЛЬНОГО  И  МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО  ПРАВА

Egor Ruslanovich SIGAURI-GORSKII

doi:10.33184/pravgos-2024.3.17

Authors

Egor Ruslanovich SIGAURI-GORSKII Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2024.3.17

Keywords:

South China Sea, China, Philippines, territorial dispute, international law of the sea, territorial claims, Spratly Islands

Abstract

The South China Sea (SCS) dispute is one of the main sources of security threats for the Asia-Pacific. Due to it being a complex set of intricacies of political and legal factors, legal positions and international legal policy of the disputants require a special analysis. The purpose of this work is to chronologically examine the processes of legal consolidation of the territorial claims of China and the Philippines in the SCS in the second half of the 20th century. We use general scientific methods (dialectical, logical, systemic approach), applying formal logic to analyze the territorial dispute as a complex system, as well as specific scientific and special research methods (historical, formal legal, method of legal hermeneutics), through which we reveal in chronological order the legal positions of the disputants by analyzing national legislation and international legal policy. The research results suggest that Beijing has consistently brought its legislation in accordance with the provisions of key international law of the sea treaties, enshrining in its legal acts its territorial claims to disputed territories in the SCM. However, China ratified the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea without mentioning its historical waters. The Philippines initially argued that the territory of the «Freedomland», that had been «discovered» by T. Kloma, although it coincided with most of the disputed Spratly archipelago, in reality, represented a natural extension of their continental shelf. The Philippine side also argued that after the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, the disputed territories were «terra nullius» because there were no specific provisions as to whose sovereignty they should be transferred to.

Author Biography

Egor Ruslanovich SIGAURI-GORSKII , Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

Postgraduate Student of the Department of International Law.

References

Модель развития современного Китая: оценки, дискуссии, прогнозы : монография / под ред. А.Д. Воскресенского. – Москва : Стратегические изыскания, 2019. – 736 с.

Китай в мировой политике / В.Я. Белокреницкий, А.Д. Воскресенский, Ю.М. Галенович и др. ; отв. ред.-сост. А.Д. Воскресенский ; Московский государственный институт международных отношений (Университет). – Москва : Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2001. – 528 с.

Толстых В.Л. Территориальные споры в Восточной и Юго-Восточной Азии: особенности и перспективы международно-правового урегулирования / В.Л. Толстых // Азиатско-Тихоокеанский регион: экономика, политика, право. – 2019. – Т. 21, № 3. – С. 53–69.

Chiu H. China and The Question Of Territorial Sea / H. Chiu // Maryland Journal of International Law. – 1975. – Vol. 1, iss. 1. – P. 29–79.

Guifang X. China and the Law of the Sea: An Update / X. Guifang // International Law Studies. US Naval War College. – 2008. – Vol. 84. – P. 97–110.

Hyun-Soo K. The 1992 Chinese Territorial Sea Law in the Light of the UN Convention / K. Hyun-Soo // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. – 1994. – Vol. 43, № 4. – P. 894–904.

Сигаури-Горский Е.Р. Подходы к интерпретации «Линии девяти пунктиров» в китайской науке международного права / Е.Р. Сигаури-Горский // Аграрное и земельное право. – 2023. – № 7 (223). – С. 149–151.

Вылегжанин А.Н. Решения Международного суда ООН по спорам о разграничении морских пространств / А.Н. Вылегжанин. – Москва : Юридическая литература, 2004. – 224 c.

Granados U. Ocean frontier expansion and the Kalayaan Islands Group claim: Philippines’ postwar pragmatism in the South China Sea / U. Granados // International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. – 2009. – Vol. 9. – P. 267–294.

Гуреев С.А. Международное морское право : учебное пособие / С.А. Гуреев, И.В. Зенкин, Г.Г. Иванов ; отв. ред. С.А. Гуреев. – 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. – Москва, 2011. – 432 с.

Курс международного права : в 7 т. Т. 5. Отрасли международного права / В.С. Верещетин, С.В. Виноградов, Г.М. Даниленко и др. – Москва : Наука, 1992. – 336 c.