ФОРМЫ  И  ПРИЕМЫ  ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЯ   ОРГАНОВ  ПРЕДВАРИТЕЛЬНОГО  СЛЕДСТВИЯ   С  ПОДРАЗДЕЛЕНИЕМ  ПО  ДЕЛАМ  НЕСОВЕРШЕННОЛЕТНИХ

Victoria Victorovna USHAKOVA

doi:10.33184/pravgos-2024.2.26

Authors

Victoria Victorovna USHAKOVA Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2024.2.26

Keywords:

minor, forms of interaction, methods of interaction, investigator, juvenile affairs unit, preliminary investigation, information

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increase in the level of crime among minors; these circumstances raise serious concerns and require great attention. High-quality investigation of crimes committed by adolescents is a key aspect of modern law enforcement. The interaction of preliminary investigation bodies with juvenile affairs units is a pressing problem today. Officers need to analyze the characteristics of interaction, the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches. Based on the analysis of practical experience, the author offers practical recommendations for optimizing this process in order to ensure the protection of the rights of minors and the effective fight against crime among this category of population. Purpose: to analyze the problems of interaction between the investigator and the juvenile affairs unit, optimizing and developing joint work of subjects to investigate crimes committed by minors. Methods: specific scientific methods (conversation and interviews, questionnaires, comparative legal analysis); empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic, analogy, analysis, generalization, classification; psychological methods. Results: the study makes it possible to identify and consider one of the most problematic issues of interaction between the investigator and the juvenile affairs unit, that is the lack of clearly defined techniques of joint work based on the forms of interaction. The author gives a classification of special private techniques, taking into account the age of the suspect and his behavior (attitude to the investigation process).

Author Biography

Victoria Victorovna USHAKOVA , Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Adjunct of the Faculty of Training of Scientific and Scientific-Pedagogical Personnel

References

Бурлака С.А. Цели принудительных мер воспитательного воздействия / С.А. Бурлака // Российский следователь. – 2013. – № 5. – С. 25–28.

Криминалистика : учебник / под ред. А.Г. Филиппова. – Москва : Юриспруденция, 2000. – 352 с.

Криминалистика : учебник : в 3 т. / под общ. ред. А.И. Бастрыкина. – Москва, 2014. – Т. 2. – 559 с.

Герасимов И.Ф. Теоретические проблемы раскрытия преступлений / И.Ф. Герасимов. – Москва, 1979. – 45 с.

Криминалистика / под ред. И.Ф. Пантелеева, Н.А. Селиванова. – Мо-сква, 1988. – 670 с.

Богуславский А.В. Понятие, формы и субъекты взаимодействия при раскрытии и расследовании наркопреступлений в уголовно-исполнительной системе / А.В. Богуславский // Вестник Владимирского юридического института. – 2012. – № 4. – С. 3–10.

Криминалистика / под ред. А.Н. Васильева. – Москва, 1980. – 462 с.

Оспанов С.Д. Взаимодействие следователя с органами дознания : учебное пособие / С.Д. Оспанов. – Караганда, 1992. – 88 с.

Багмет А.М. Планирование как одна из форм непроцессуального взаимодействия следователей с органами дознания при раскрытии и расследо-вании массовых беспорядков / А.М. Багмет // Российский следователь. – 2012. – № 6. – С. 336–342.