ИНФОРМИРОВАННОЕ  СОГЛАСИЕ  КАК  ПРАВОВОЕ  СРЕДСТВО  РЕГУЛИРОВАНИЯ  МЕДИЦИНСКИХ  ОТНОШЕНИЙ

Анастасия Александровна ПЕСТРИКОВА; Лариса Николаевна СМОРЧКОВА

doi:10.33184/pravgos-2024.2.20

Authors

Анастасия Александровна ПЕСТРИКОВА
Лариса Николаевна СМОРЧКОВА Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2024.2.20

Keywords:

informed consent, medical intervention, biomedicine, genomic research, conflict of interest

Abstract

The concept of informed consent seems to be important in scientific research involving medical interventions and in clinical practice. This makes the study of this legal institution timely and relevant. Purpose: based on the results of the analysis of the formation and development of the institution of informed consent, to identify trends in its further development. Methods: systemic and structural-functional analysis, as well as special legal methods: comparative legal, formal legal, legal modeling, interpretation. Results: the article gives scientifically based proposals for improving the legal institution of informed consent. The article substantiates the conclusion that the content of consent should be absolutely transparent and understandable to all subjects involved, so that it really acts as an effective means of legal regulation of social relations related to medical intervention or research.

Author Biographies

Анастасия Александровна ПЕСТРИКОВА

Candidate of Sciences (Law)

Лариса Николаевна СМОРЧКОВА , Russian Academy of Sciences

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

References

Green D.S.T. Nuances of informed consent: the paradigm of regional Anesthesia / D.S.T. Green, C.R. MacKenzie // Hospital for Special Surgery Journal. – 2007. – № 3. – P. 115–118. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-006-9035-y (дата обращения: 12.12.2023).

Haney C. A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison / C. Haney, W.C. Banks, P.G. Zimbardo // Naval Research Reviews. – 1973. – № 9. – P. 1–17.

Capron A.M. Where did informed consent for research come from? / A.M. Capron // The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. – 2018. – № 46. – P. 12–29.

Plant R. MIS Research involving human subjects: processes and IRB re-quirements / R. Plant, A.P. Pons // Communications of the Association for Informa-tion Systems. – 2006. – № 17. – P. 404–427.

Сон И.М. Информированное добровольное согласие – реализация па-циентоориентированных технологий в медицинских организациях / И.М. Сон, З.Л. Гончаревская, В.В. Киндюк // Современные проблемы здравоохранения и медицинской статистики. – 2023. – № 3. – С. 1070–1086.

Мыльникова И.С. Информированное согласие в России: искажения и злоупотребления / И.С. Мыльникова // Медицинская этика. – 2021. – Т. 9, № 1. – С. 51–56.

Андрианова В.В. Информированное добровольное согласие пациента как условие медицинского вмешательства / В.В. Андрианова, М.А. Асташкина, Е.В. Савощикова // Право и государство: теория и практика. – 2023. – № 4. – С. 231–233.

Rhodes R. In defense of the duty to participate in biomedical research / R. Rhodes // American Journal of Bioethics. – 2008. – № 8. – P. 37–38.

Rennie S. Regarding research participation as a moral obligation: who shoulders the burdens and who reaps the benefits? / S. Rennie // Asian Bioethics Review. – 2010. – № 2. – P. 308–321.

Ioannidis J.P. Informed consent, big data, and the oxymoron of research that is not research / J.P. Ioannidis // American Journal of Bioethics. – 2013. – № 13. – P. 40–42.

Narayanan A. Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. 2008 IEEE symposium on security and privacy / A. Narayanan, V. Shmatikov // IEEE. – 2008. – № 3. – P. 111–125.

McGuire A.L. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research / A.L. McGuire, L.M. Beskow // Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. – 2010. – № 1. – P. 361–381.

Budin-Lajsne I. et al. Dynamic consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research / I. Budin-Ljasne, H.J. Teare, J. Kaye et al. // BMC Medical Ethics. – 2017. – № 18. – P. 1–4.

Grady C. Broad consent for research with biological samples: workshop conclusions / C. Grady, L. Eckstein, B. Berkman, D. Brock, R. Cook-Deegan, S.M. Fullerton // American Journal of Bioethics. – 2015. – № 15. – P. 34–42.

Wendler D. Broad versus blanket consent for research with human biological samples / D. Wendler // Hastings Center Report. – 2013. – № 43. – P. 3–4.

Wolf S.M. The past, present, and future of informed consent in research and translational medicine / S.M. Wolf, E.W. Clayton, F. Lawrenz // The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. – 2018. – № 46. – P. 7–11.

Hertz R. Random families: genetic strangers, sperm donor siblings, and the creation of new kin / R. Hertz, M.K. Nelson // Society. – 2019. – Vol. 56. – P. 524–527. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12115-019-00409-x (дата обращения: 12.12.2023).

Пестрикова А.А. Особенности институтов информированного согласия и права собственности при правовом регулировании отношений, связанных с биологическим материалом человека / А.А. Пестрикова, Л.Н. Сморчкова // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2022. – Т. 17, № 12. – С. 110–120.