THE ISSUE OF A SYSTEM OF UNIVERSAL CRITERIA FOR THE QUALITY OF JUSTICE IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL LITERATURE AND PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2023.4.12Keywords:
assessment of the quality of justice, judicial errors, universal criteria, criminal proceedings, courtAbstract
The problem of non-informativeness of the only officially accepted by the Russian courts for determining the quality of justice indicator «stability» of court decisions determines the need for the application of additional criteria in order to give a meaningful picture of the state of justice in the country. In this regard, the author considers foreign models for assessing the quality of justice by classifying them and identifying typological features. The purpose of the research is to study the positive experience of foreign judicial management in order to justify the need to expand the national methodology for assessing the quality of justice. Methods: comparative-legal, system analysis and synthesis. Results: the paper reveals the primitiveness of the quantitative (statistical) method of measuring the quality of justice as aimed at identifying only such indicators that do not express the specificity of the function of resolving social conflicts realized by the court, but are attributable to any type of public service. The multifactor and multicomponent nature of the phenomenon of «justice» determines the need to expand the methodology used to measure its quality.
References
Поздняков М.Л. Критерии оценки качества работы судей и дисциплинарная ответственность / М.Л. Поздняков. – Москва : Статут, 2014. – 56 с.
Васильев Д.С. Показатели судебной статистики как критерии оценки судебной деятельности / Д.С. Васильев // Право и политика. – 2021. – № 3. – С. 79–100.
Астафьев А.Ю. Эффективность судебной деятельности: понятие и критерии оценки / А.Ю. Астафьев // Судебная власть и правосудие. Вестник ВГУ. Серия: Право. – 2012. – № 1 (12). – С. 129–132.
Азгальдов Г.Г. О квалиметрии / Г.Г. Азгальдов, Э.П. Райхман. – Москва : Изд-во стандартов, 1972. – 172 с.
Потапов С.А. Вопросы повышения качества работы судов / С.А. Потапов // Вестник ТГУ. – 2015. – Т. 20, вып. 10. – С. 173–179.
Морщакова Т.Г. Судебное управление в международных нормах «мягкого права» и российских практиках / Т.Г. Морщакова // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. – 2017. – № 1 (116). – С. 81–94.
Fabri M. The administration of Justice in Europe: towards the development of quality standards / M. Fabri, P. Langbroek, H. Pauliat. – Bologna : Lo Scarabeo, 2003. 494 р.
An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management Under the Civil Justice Reform Act / J.S. Kakalik, T. Dunworth, L.A. Hill, D.F. McCaffrey, M. Oshiro, N.M. Pace, M.E. Vaiana. – Santa Monica : RAND Corporation, 1996. – 386 p.
Баймолдина З.Х. Гражданское судопроизводство в Республике Казахстан: новеллы и тенденции / З.Х. Баймолдина // Правовое государство: теория и практика. – 2023. – № 3. – С. 149–155.
Comparing the evaluation and development of the quality of Justice in Finland, France, Hungary, Italy and The Netherlands / H. Pauliat, C. Foulquier, M. Bencze et al. // Handle with Care Assessing and designing methods for evaluation and development of the quality of justice/ ed. F. Contini. – Bologna, 2017. – P. 277–296.
Evaluation of the quality of adjudication in courts of law: principles and proposed Quality Benchmarks: Quality Project of the Courts in the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal of Rovaniemi, Finland. – Rovaniemi : Rovaniemi Court of Appeal, 2006. – 79 p.
Handle with Care Assessing and designing methods for evaluation and development of the quality of justice / еd. F. Contini. – Bologna, 2017. – 406 p.
Стандарты справедливого правосудия (международные и национальные практики) / под. ред. Т.Г. Морщаковой. – Москва : Мысль, 2012. – 584 с.
Сидоренко М.В. Правовая определенность позиций Европейского суда по правам человека для системы российского уголовно-процессуального права / М.В. Сидоренко // Международное уголовное право и международная юстиция. – 2017. – № 5. – С. 6–9.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-01-11 (2)
- 2024-01-11 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, unless appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and all made changes are indicated.
