ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL AS A GUARANTEE OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE DIGITAL SOCIETY (BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL (SUPERVISION) OVER INDUSTRIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2023.2.4

Keywords:

state environmental administration, environmental control and supervision, state control in the field of waste management, reform of control and supervision activities

Abstract

The article discusses some results of the reform of control and supervision activities taking place in the Russian Federation from 2016 to the present. The pros and cons of the reform are illustrated by the example of environmental control, including control over waste management. Purpose: to analyze the results of the reform of control and supervision activities on the example of state environmental control (supervision) over industrial waste management. Methods: data retrieval and collection; data processing: description, generalization, classification, search for patterns; analysis of data processing results. Results: the current legal regulation of relations in the field of environmental control and supervision requires further improvement in order to achieve the goals set for reforming the entire system of control activities in the country, and to the system of state environmental administration. The situation when the achievement of some indicators occurs at the expense of reducing others in the public administration sector seems unacceptable, or rather short-sighted, especially when the achievement of economic indicators is prioritized over environmental ones.

Author Biography

Nadezhda Mikhailovna ZASLAVSKAYA, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Assistant Professor of the Department of Environmental and Land Law, Faculty of Law

References

Голиченков А.К. Экологический контроль: теория и практика право-вого регулирования / А.К. Голиченков. – Москва : МГУ, 1991. – 325 с.

Петров В.В. Закон Российской Федерации об охране окружающей природной среды: концепция и механизм реализации / В.В. Петров // Государ-ство и право. – 1992. – № 11. – С. 73–84.

Спиридонов А.А. Комплексное реформирование контроля и надзора: отечественный опыт в конституционно-правовом измерении / А.А. Спиридонов // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2022. – № 10. – С. 102–116.

Гордиенко У.Н. Тенденции развития контрольно-надзорной деятель-ности в рамках «регуляторной гильотины» / У.Н. Гордиенко // Административное право и процесс. – 2022. – № 10. – С. 85–88.

Переседов А.М. Институт превенции в законодательстве о контроле (надзоре) / А.М. Переседов // Административное право и процесс. – 2021. – № 12. – С. 51–54.

Русин С.Н. Экологическая политика и право. Проблемы формирова-ния и реализации / С.Н. Русин // Экологическое право. – 2016. – № 3. – С. 9–15.

Закупень Т.В. Особенности перехода права собственности на отходы промышленного производства в рамках заключения концессионных соглаше-ний государственно-частного партнерства / Т.В. Закупень // Хозяйство и право. – 2022. – № 4. – С. 90–105.

Published

2023-07-04

How to Cite

[1]
ЗАСЛАВСКАЯ, Н.М. 2023. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL AS A GUARANTEE OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE DIGITAL SOCIETY (BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL (SUPERVISION) OVER INDUSTRIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT). The rule-of-law state: theory and practice. 19, 2(72) (Jul. 2023), 30–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2023.2.4.

Issue

Section

PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) SCIENCES