ON THE ISSUE OF IMPROVING THE MECHANISM FOR IDENTIFYING AND ACCOUNTING FOR ESCHEATED REAL ESTATE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2022.3.7

Keywords:

escheated property, public law education, notary, civil registration authority, rights registration authority, heir, digitalization

Abstract

The procedure for the inheritance and accounting for escheated property transferred by law to the ownership of the Russian Federation, as well as the procedure for its transfer to the ownership of constituent entities of the Russian Federation or to the ownership of municipalities, shall be determined by law, as specified in paragraph 3 of Article 1151 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. However, since the entry into force of the third part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, that is, more than twenty years, there has been no civil law regulation of legal relations related to escheated property. The new coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), which began in 2020, has added urgency to the issues of identifying and accounting for escheated property. On the one hand, the relevance is linked to the social consequences of the pandemic in terms of increased mortality, as a result of which the number of escheated property increased, on the other hand, it is linked to the digitization of interdepartmental interaction between public law entities, digitization of large volumes of data held by public law entities, provision of state and municipal services in electronic form, which can be used when identifying and accounting for escheated property. Purpose: to analyze the issues of improving the mechanism for identifying and accounting for escheated property. In particular, escheated real estate is of particular interest as one of the things of value for civil turnover. Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation, analysis and synthesis; specific scientific methods: legal-dogmatic and interpretation of legal norms. Results: the study allows the authors to identify two vectors for accounting and identifying of escheated real estate. One of the vectors is aimed at the development and application of model provisions by local self-government bodies on the example of the regulations on the accounting and identification of escheated real estate in Moscow. The second vector is aimed at digitalizing interaction between notary bodies and civil registration bodies, as well as between rights registration bodies and local self-government bodies in order to identify and account for escheated real estate with the use of digital technologies. These vectors undoubtedly have as their premise the establishment of legality, law and order, balance in private and public interests in the Russian Federation.

Author Biographies

Aliya Aslyamovna GIBADULLINA , Department of the Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastrial Records and Cartography in the Republic of Bashkortostan

Chief Expert of the Legal Support Division of the fDepartment of the Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastrial Records and Cartography in the Republic of Bashkortostan

Aysylu Tagirovna GAIMALEEVA, Bashkir State University

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor of the Chair of Civil Law of the Institute of
Law

Daria Vladimirovna KOROLYOVA, Bashkir State University

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor of the Chair of Civil Law of the Institute of
Law

References

Хаскельберг Б.Л. Переход выморочного наследства к публичному образованию / Б.Л. Хаскельберг, В.В. Ровный // Наследственное право. – 2012. – № 1. – С. 33–41.

Черепахин Б.Б. Труды по гражданскому праву / Б.Б. Черепахин. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/edu/student/download_books/book/trudy_po_grazhdanskomu_pravu/.

Демичев А.А. Проблемы наследования выморочного имущества в Российской Федерации / А.А. Демичев // Юридическая наука и практика: Вестник Нижегородской академии МВД России. – 2014. – № 1 (25). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-nasledovaniya-vymorochnogo-imuschestva-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii.

Новиков А.А. Наследование выморочного имущества в РФ / А.А. Новиков. URL: https://repozytorium.uwb.edu.pl/jspui/bitstream/11320/2087/1/BSP_11_2012_Nowikow.pdf.

Плиев Н.Р. Проблема гражданско-правовой ответственности наследников по долгам наследодателя в юридической науке / Н.Р. Плиев, Ф.З. Джикаева // Балтийский гуманитарный журнал. – 2016. – Т. 5, № 1 (14). – С. 201–204.

Шершеневич Г.Ф. Курс гражданского права. Введение. Общая часть. Особенная часть / Г.Ф. Шершеневич. – Тула : Автограф, 2001. 719 с.

Федорнак О.А. Развитие электронного нотариата в Российской Федерации / О.А. Федорнак // Молодой ученый. – 2020. – № 43 (333). – С. 258–260.

Корнев А.В. Цифровые технологии, правовые риски и проблема их минимизации / А.В. Корнев // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2021. – № 9. – С. 11–20.

Published

2022-10-20

How to Cite

[1]
ГИБАДУЛЛИНА , А.А., ГАЙМАЛЕЕВА, А.Т. and КОРОЛЁВА, Д.В. 2022. ON THE ISSUE OF IMPROVING THE MECHANISM FOR IDENTIFYING AND ACCOUNTING FOR ESCHEATED REAL ESTATE . The rule-of-law state: theory and practice. 18, 3(69) (Oct. 2022), 56–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2022.3.7.

Issue

Section

ГТ