ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF INTERACTION WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A BASIS OF LEGAL REGULATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2020.3.4Keywords:
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ROBOT, ROBOTICS, LEGAL REGULATION, RULE-OF-LAW STATE, ETHICS, EMPATHY, CODE OF ETHICSAbstract
The issues of legal regulation of legal and ethical principles of interaction between a person, society, and the state represented by state bodies are a necessary condition for guaranteeing constitutional norms that enshrine a person, his rights and freedoms as the highest value of the Russian Federation. AI, taking on the tasks of end-to-end and transparent state and municipal management based on Big data and using Artificial intelligence, is a special element in the emerging public relations, which we believe should be subject to the robot ethics and AI ethics, created like legal ethics. That is why the ethics of decision-making and actions of the AI itself, the ethics of those programmers who create algorithms that these systems use to operate and self-learn, the ethics of human interaction with cyberphysical and cognitive systems is a subject of legal regulation.
Purpose: to analyze the current ethical principles of interaction between human and artificial intelligence, neural networks and smart robots, which are the basis for the formation of modern legislation in this area in the United States, Western Europe and East Asia.
Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods are used: comparative-legal, legal-dogmatic.
Results: the study allows us to determine the essential features of human interaction ethics and ethics of AI software creators, professional ethics of AI system developers, and decision-making ethics based on a comparative legal analysis of existing ethical codes and other legal documents on the use and interaction with AI.
References
Готовцев П.М., Карпов В.Э., Нестик Т.А., Потапова Е.Г. Зачем искусственному интеллекту этика? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ethics. cdto.center/3_1 (дата обращения: 03.04.2020).
Зубец О.Н. Моральная философия и этика: взгляд через различения начала и причины // Гуманитарные ведомости ТПГУ им. Л.Н. Толстого. 2019. № 2 (30). С. 148-158. DOI: 10.22405/2304-4772-2019-1-2-148-158
Максимов Л.В. Этика и мораль: соотношение понятий // Этическая мысль. 2003. С. 14-22.
Путин В.В. РФ способна стать одним из глобальных лидеров в сфере искусственного интеллекта [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/7096728 (дата обращения: 28.03.2020).
Стерледев Р.К., Стерледева Т.Д. Искусственный интеллект в аспекте ноосферы: почти фантастика? // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета (ПНИПУ). Культура. История. Философия. Право. 2017. № 2. С. 61-65. 10.15593/perm. kipf/2017.2.08 (дата обращения: 28.03.2020). DOI: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2017.2.08(
Шестаков И. Моральный код: почему общество не может научить компьютер морали. 20 февраля 2019 г. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://iz.ru/ 844965/ignat-shestakov/moralnyi-kod-pochemu-obshchestvo-ne-mozhet-nauchit-kompiuter-morali (дата обращения 03.04.2020).
Foot Ph. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect in Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.
Holley Р., Gates В.Оn dangers of artificial intelligence: "I don't understand why some people are not concerned" (2015) [Electronic Resources]. URL: https://www.washing tonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/ (дата обращения: 02.04.2020).
Musk E. We need to Regulate AI before 'it's too Late' [Electronic Resources]. URL: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/342345-elon-musk-we-need-to-regulate-ai-before-its-too-late (дата обращения: 02.04.2020).
Simonite T. AI experts want to end "black box" algorithms in government [Электронный ресурс] // Wired Business. URL: https://www.wired.com/ story/ai-experts-want-to-end-black-box-algorithms-in-government (дата обращения: 13.03.2020).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anna Popova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, unless appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and all made changes are indicated.




