TRANSFORMATION OF CIVIL LAW CONTRACT REGULATION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL RELATIONS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF BANKRUPTCY RISKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2026.2.24Keywords:
civil law contractual regulation, freedom of contract, bankruptcy, contesting transactions, affiliation, preference, increased standard of proof, subordination of claimsAbstract
The relevance of the research is determined by a significant increase in the number of bankruptcy cases and the formation of new approaches by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in 2025–2026, which fundamentally alter the legal environment for participants in entrepreneurial relations. Furthermore, the higher judicial authority has recently established the institute of subordination of claims by affiliated creditors, which holds critical significance for civil law contractual regulation. Purpose: to study the current state of civil law contractual regulation in the context of an increasing number of bankruptcy risks and the circumstances influencing its transformation. Methods: utilizing systematic and formal-logical methods, an examination of judicial practice materials is conducted, based on which relevant conclusions are drawn and practical recommendations are formulated using the method of generalization. The nature of civil law contracts and civil law contractual regulation is analyzed using the dogmatic method, revealing its characteristics. Additionally, employing the legal forecasting method, trends and prospects for the further development of judicial practice in the field of civil law contractual regulation of entrepreneurial relations are identified. Results: based on the conducted research on the limits of contractual freedom within entrepreneurial legal relations amid the risk of potential bankruptcy of the counterparty, this article formulates practical recommendations aimed at minimizing the risks of contesting contracts at each stage of the contractual process.
References
Кашанина Т.В. Соотношение централизованного и децентрализованного регулирования / Т.В. Кашанина // Правоведение. – 1991. – № 4. – С. 54–64.
Казанцев М.Ф. Концепция гражданско-правового договорного регулирования : автореф. дис. … д-ра юрид. наук : 12.00.03 / М.Ф. Казанцев. – Екатеринбург, 2008. – 43 с.
Артемова А.Н. Доктрина «снятия корпоративной вуали» и концепция бенефициарной собственности: перспективы применения в России / А.Н. Артемова // Гражданское право. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 43–46.
Попондопуло В.Ф. Банкротство. Правовое регулирование : научно-практическое пособие / В.Ф. Попондопуло. – 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. – Москва : Проспект, 2025. – 416 с.
Суханов Е.А. Сравнительное корпоративное право / Е.А. Суханов. – Москва : Статут, 2024. – 460 с.
Белов В.А. Добросовестность, разумность, справедливость как принципы гражданского права / В.А. Белов // Законодательство. – 1998. – № 8. – С. 49–52.
Зеленая У. Продавец банкрот. Вашу квартиру могут отобрать через 3 года после покупки / У. Зеленая // Жилищное право. – 2024. – № 6 [Электронный ресурс]. – URL: https://www.consultant.ru (дата обращения: 01.03.2026).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, unless appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and all made changes are indicated.




