VIRTUAL REALITY AS AN OBJECT OF LEGAL REGULATION: THE ESSENCE, THREATS AND PROTECTION MECHANISMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.3.14Keywords:
virtual reality, virtual environment, virtual world, cyberbullying, computer offences, personal data, identificationAbstract
Due to the development of virtual reality technologies, it is an urgent task to develop measures aimed at protecting users from potential information threats. In the context of cross-border relations in virtual reality, Russia’s technological dependence on foreign countries, and the low level of knowledge among citizens in the field of information security, this task becomes especially important. Purpose: to identify the specifics of legal regulation and develop mechanisms for protecting virtual reality users, taking into account the specific features of this technology and current challenges. The study uses methods of system analysis to comprehensively understand the legal nature of virtual reality; comparative legal analysis is used to compare national and foreign legislation, and law enforcement practice; synthesis is used to summarize the theoretical and empirical data obtained in order to form the author’s concept of legal regulation; legal modeling is used to develop proposals for improving current legislation and form effective mechanisms for protecting virtual reality users. Results: the article proposes the author’s concept of the relationship between the concepts of “virtual reality”, “virtual world” and “virtual environment”, according to which the concept of “virtual reality” is specific in relation to the concepts of “virtual environment” and “virtual world”. This approach makes it possible to extend existing norms applicable in other virtual environments to virtual reality. In order to ensure protection of user data, the article proposes amendments to the legislation regulating the turnover of biometric personal data with the aim of protecting unidentified users at the level of identified ones, as well as the introduction of a special form of consent to the processing of personal data. The article notes the need to amend the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation due to the particular danger of cyberbullying and other offenses in virtual reality. Administrative measures to counter information threats are proposed: the introduction of state standards, licensing systems, rapid response protocols, user identification, and a common database of violators. The article highlights the need to actively involve creators, developers, and users of virtual reality in shaping future regulation, creating “regulatory sandboxes”, and improving the knowledge of law enforcement officials and users in the field of information security.
References
Jie Huang. Analysis of the Future Prospects for the Metaverse / Jie Huang, Pingjin Sun, Weijie Zhang. // Advances in Economics. Business and Management Research. – 2022. – Vol. 211. – P. 1899–1904.
Минбалеев А.В. Правовые проблемы и риски проведения спортивных мероприятий в метавселенной / А.В. Минбалеев, Е.В. Титова // Человек. Спорт. Медицина. – 2023. – № S1. – С. 136–142.
Blascovich J. Social Influence within Immersive Virtual Environments / J. Blascovich // The Social Life of Avatars. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer. – London, 2002. – P. 127–145.
Холодная Е.В. О правовой концепции метавселенных / Е.В. Холодная // Lex Russica. – 2024. – № 77 (3). – С. 116–128.
Филипова И.А. Создание метавселенной: последствия для экономики, общества и права / И.А. Филипова // Журнал цифровых технологий и права. – 2023. – Т. 1, № 1. – С. 7–32.
Евсиков К.С. Метавселенные как новый объект регулирования для информационного права / К.С. Евсиков // Труды по интеллектуальной собственности (Works on Intellectual Property). – 2023. – Т. 44, № 1. – С. 47–57.
Дремлюга Р.И. Виртуальная реальность: общие проблемы правового регулирования / Р.И. Дремлюга // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2020. – Т. 15, № 9. – С. 39–49.
Lemley M. Law, Virtual Reality, and Augmented Reality / M. Lemley, E. Volokh // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. – 2018. – Vol. 166, № 5. – P. 1051–1138.
Федотов М.А. Конституционные ответы на вызовы киберпространства / М.А. Федотов // Lex Russica. – 2016. – № 3. – С. 164–182.
Архипов В.В. Персонажи (аватары) в многопользовательских компьютерных играх: вопросы правовой квалификации в свете междисциплинарных исследований / В.В. Архипов // Закон. – 2022. – № 3. – С. 58–74.
Бачило И.Л. Институциональный подход к решению проблем понятийного аппарата в информационном законодательстве / И.Л. Бачило // Понятийный аппарат в информационном праве : монография / отв. ред.: И.Л. Бачило, Т.А. Полякова, В.Б. Наумов. – Москва : ИГП РАН – Издательство «Канон+» РООИ «Реабилитация», 2017. – 264 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, unless appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and all made changes are indicated.




