DIGITALIZATION IN REGULATING THE LIST OF FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS HELD IN NON-STATE FORENSIC EXPERT ORGANIZATIONS

Authors

  • Ruslan Abdullin Bashkir State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2020.4.38

Keywords:

FORENSIC EXPERT ACTIVITY, EXPERT, NON-STATE FORENSIC ORGANIZATIONS, DIGITALIZATION, HIGH-TECH METHODS, LIST OF EXAMINATIONS

Abstract

The study of the practice of investigating crimes indicates the need to use the achievements of high technologies, expressed in the most advanced form - digitalization. The possibilities of digitalization are being introduced into forensic activities, including non-state forensic organizations activities.

Purpose: to analyze the problems of normative, scientific and methodological, material and technical regulation of the list of forensic examinations held outside state forensic organizations, with the development of solutions.

Methods: the author uses empirical methods of observation, comparison, description, interpreting, interpretation of legal norms, comparative legal and statistical analysis, and formal logical methods of scientific knowledge.

As a result of the study of various approaches, analysis of national and foreign regulatory legal acts, the author proves the necessity to develop a list of forensic examinations prohibited for production in non-state forensic organizations, which makes it possible to determine ways to increase the level of digitalization of forensic examinations by improving legal, scientific, methodological and organizational support of forensic expert activities in the Russian Federation.

References

Аминев Ф.Г., Чемерис А.В. О новых методах цифровизации при проведении генотипоскопической экспертизы и геномной регистрации населения Российской Федерации // Цифровой след как объект судебной экспертизы: матер. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., 17 янв. 2020 г. / ред. колл.: Е.Р. Россинская, А.К. Лебедева, М.С. Чернявская. М.: Проспект, 2020. С. 14-18.

Аминев Ф.Г. О необходимости принятия федерального закона "О всеобщей геномной регистрации в Российской Федерации" в целях улучшения качества раскрытия и расследования преступлений // Правовое государство: теория и практика. 2019. № 3 (57). С. 94-98.

Аминев Ф.Г., Анисимов А.В. Об организационном аспекте современной технологии всеобщей ДНК-регистрации граждан // Правовое государство: теория и практика. 2020. № 2 (60). С. 11-19.

Варданян А.В., Варданян Г.А. Теоретико-методологические проблемы криминалистической тактики в контексте современной модели уголовного процесса // Юристъ-Правоведъ. 2015. № 6. С. 5-10.

Аминев Ф.Г. Проблемные вопросы, возникающие при назначении новых родов и видов судебных экспертиз // Судебная экспертиза. 2018. № 2. С. 7-15.

Аминев Ф.Г., Аминев А.Ф. О возможностях использования генотипоскопического и дендрохронологического методов в криминалистической регистрации лесного массива России // Вестник криминалистики. 2019. № 1 (69). С. 6-12.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

[1]
Абдуллин, Р. 2020. DIGITALIZATION IN REGULATING THE LIST OF FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS HELD IN NON-STATE FORENSIC EXPERT ORGANIZATIONS. The rule-of-law state: theory and practice. 16, 4-2 (Apr. 2020), 223–232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2020.4.38.

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 4-2 (2020)

Section

TRIBUNE FOR YOUNG SCIENTISTS

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Ruslan Abdullin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, unless appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and all made changes are indicated.