INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF THE EXPERTISE IN CASES RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Authors

  • Anton Savenko RUDN University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2020.4.33

Keywords:

FORENSIC EXAMINATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, EXPERTISE, PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Abstract

In the context of digitalization of the economy and the growing number of legal proceedings related to intellectual property objects, there is a need to form a forensic examination of intellectual property objects as a new type of expertise produced by state forensic institutions. In order to form this new direction, it is necessary to study foreign experience of using the expertise in such cases.

Purpose: to study the experience of using the expertise in cases of intellectual property objects in some foreign countries.

Results: general dialectical method, in particular methods of formal logic, a number of general scientific methods such as comparison, description, etc., as well as special scientific methods: formal-legal, comparative-legal. Conclusions: the study shows different approaches to the organization of legal proceedings using expertise in the courts of Germany, Japan, Ukraine and the United States. This foreign experience will help to form Russian approach to the forensic examination of intellectual property objects.

References

Landgericht München I. Patentstreitsachen. URL: https://www.justiz. bayern.de/gerichte-und-behoerden/landgericht/muenchen-1/verfahren_03.php.

IHK für München und Oberbayern: Service. URL: https://www.ihk-muenchen.de/service.

Bundespatentgericht: Jurisdiction: Proceedings. URL: https://www. bundespatentgericht.de/DE/Home/home_node.html.

Deutsche Patent und Markenamt (DPMA): Patentanwaltsausbildung. URL: https://www.dpma.de/dpma/wir_ueber_uns/weitere_aufgaben/ patentanwaltsausbildung/index.html/pruefung/index.html.

Експертна служба МВС України: Види дослiджень. URL: https:// dndekc.mvs.gov.ua/%d0%b2%d0%b8%d0%b4%d0%b8-%d0%b4%d0%be% d1%81%d0%bb%d1%96%d0%b4%d0%b6%d0%b5%d0%bd%d1%8c.

Гончаренка В.Г. Експертизи в судочинствi України: моногр. Київ: Юрiнком Iнтер, 2017. 504 с.

Kiсiль Н.В. Особливостi проведения експертних дослiджень, пов'язаних з лiтературними творами наукового характеру // Криминалистика и судебная экспертиза: междунар. науч.-метод. сб. Киев: Министерство юстиции Украины, 2013. Вып. 58, ч. 1. C. 385-390.

Максимов С.Й., Полiщук I.Ю. Пiдходи та методи визначення розмiру збиткiв внаслiдок порушення авторских прав на комп'ютернi програми // Криминалистика и судебная экспертиза: междунар. науч.-метод. сб. Киев: Министерство юстиции Украины, 2013. Вып. 58, ч. 1. C. 391-399.

Елiферова О.Б. Востановлення елементiв змiсту та форми передач (програм) органiзацiй мовления при проведеннi судовоi експертиз // Криминалистика и судебная экспертиза: междунар. науч.-метод. сб. Киев: Министерство юстиции Украины, 2013. Вып. 58, ч. 1. C. 400-406.

Browne N., Kubasek N., Jacobs A.Q. Juries in U.S. patent cases: A comparative portrait of the boundaries of democracy // North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology. 2018. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 199-214.

Lemley M.A. Kendall J. Martin C. Rush to Judgment? Trial Length and Outcomes in Patent Cases. // American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal. 2013. Vol. 42, № 2. P. 169-187.

Moore K.A. Populism and Patents // New York University Law Review. 2007. Vol. 82, № 1. P. 70-110.

Moore K.A. Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases - An Empirical Peek Inside the Black Box // Michigan Law Review. 2000. Vol. 99, № 2. P. 365-409.

Morningside Patent Litigation Support. URL: https://www . morningtrans.com/ip-services/patent-litigation-support.

Takeshi NIINOMI Basic information on the Japan patent office and the Intellectual proprety High Court in Japan, and statutory relations between them. URL: https://ipc.arbitr.ru/files/doc/Statement_of_NIINOMI_JPO.docx .

Patent enforcement through the courts in Japan. URL: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b08ea4c0-e55e-4ac0-b8fe-ee9c0097d514 .

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

[1]
Савенко, А. 2020. INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF THE EXPERTISE IN CASES RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. The rule-of-law state: theory and practice. 16, 4-2 (Apr. 2020), 165–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2020.4.33.

Issue

Section

LAW OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES: PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE