АРБИТРАЖНОЕ  РЕШЕНИЕ  ПО  ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНОМУ  СПОРУ   В  ЮЖНО-КИТАЙСКОМ  МОРЕ  2016  ГОДА:   ВОПРОСЫ  ЮРИДИЧЕСКОЙ  СУЩНОСТИ,  КВАЛИФИКАЦИИ   И  ЕГО  АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИЕ  ОЦЕНКИ  В  КОНТЕКСТЕ  НАРРАТИВОВ  О  «КРИЗИСЕ  МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО  ПРАВА»

Egor Ruslanovich SIGAURI-GORSKII

doi:10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.27

Authors

Egor Ruslanovich SIGAURI-GORSKII Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.27

Keywords:

South China Sea, China, Philippines, territorial dispute, international arbitration, Spratly Islands, international dispute resolution

Abstract

In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued a landmark arbitral award on the territorial dispute between China and the Philippines over the South China Sea (hereinafter – SCS), which almost completely rejected China’s territorial claims as inconsistent with existing principles and norms of international law. However, the decision was not unilaterally accepted by the academic community, which raised questions about both the correct legal qualification and a full-fledged “crisis of international law”. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the essence of the 2016 arbitral award, as well as its academic assessments in the context of the discourse on the “crisis of international law”. To achieve this purpose, the author uses general scientific methods (dialectical, logical, systemic), which apply the tools of formal logic to analyze the arbitral award on the dispute as a complex system, as well as specific scientific and special research methods (formal-legal method, method of legal hermeneutics), which allow a detailed examination of both the legal essence of the award and its legal assessments in the academic literature. Results: although the 2016 award failed to bring full legal certainty to the parties’ relations regarding the SCS, it is, nevertheless a valuable precedent for the general practice of international law of the sea and will serve as a further legal guideline in settling similar disputes. Assessments of the arbitral award as having no real legal significance and as an example of a crisis in the entire system of international law seem untenable and indicate nihilistic tendencies in the international legal consciousness.

Author Biography

Egor Ruslanovich SIGAURI-GORSKII , Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Research Fellow at the Centre for Vietnam and ASEAN Studies

References

Song Y-H. The South China Sea Arbitration Case Filed by the Philippines against China: Arguments concerning Low Tide Elevations, Rocks, and Islands / Y-H. Song // China Oceans Law Review. – 2015. – № 1. – P. 322–360.

Chinese Society of International Law. The South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study // Chinese Journal of International Law. – 2018. – Vol. 12, iss. 2. – P. 207–748.

Толстых В.Л. Морской арбитраж против морского права (анализ решений по делам Arctic Sunrise, о Южно-Китайском море и спору между Хорватией и Словенией) / В.Л. Толстых // Московский журнал международного права. – 2019. – № 3. – С. 128–140.

Локшин Г.М. Сообщество АСЕАН в современном мире : монография / Г.М. Локшин, Е.В. Кобелев, В.М. Мазырин. – Москва, 2019. – 296 с.

Buszynski L. Law and Realpolitik: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling and the South China Sea / L. Buszynski // Asian Yearbook of International Law. – 2015. – Vol. 21. – P. 121–140.

McDorman T. The South China Sea Arbitration: Selected Legal Notes / T. McDorman // Asian Yearbook of International Law. – 2015. – Vol. 21. – P. 3–15.

Королев А.С. Территориальный спор в Южно-Китайском море: есть ли свет в конце туннеля или перспективы разрешения конфликта / А.С. Королев, И.А. Стрельникова. – Москва, 2021. – 17 c.

Sinaga O. The Crisis of International Law in International Political Econo-my: Case Study of South China Sea Dispute / O. Sinaga, V. Robertua // The Journal of Asia Pacific Studies. – 2017. – Vol. I, № 1. – P. 44–54.