The editorial Board is guided in its activities by the provisions of Chapter 70 of the civil code "Copyright", follows international standards of ethics of scientific publications (http://publicationethics.org/resources/international-standards developed by the Committee on publication ethics The Committee on Publication Ethics — COPE) and takes into account the valuable experience of reputable international journals and publishers.
The editorial Board makes every effort to comply with ethical standards adopted by the international scientific community and to prevent any violations of these rules, both in their own work and in relations with all participants of the process of scientific publications: authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, distributors and readers.
1.1. Publication in peer-reviewed journals not only provides a simple way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to set the future standards of ethical conduct for all involved in the publishing of the parties, namely: the Authors, Editors, Reviewers, Publishers and Scientific societies for the journal "Historical and socio-educational thought"
1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in the process, but is also responsible for compliance with all of the current recommendations in the published work.
1.3. The publisher assumes no obligations under the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our coffee program present impartial "report" the development of scientific thought and research, so we also understand the responsibility for the proper presentation of these "reports", especially from the point of view of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.
2. Duties Of Editors
2.1. The decision to publish
Editor of the scientific journal "Historical and socio-educational thought" personally and independently responsible for deciding on the publication, often in cooperation with the relevant Scientific community, namely with the Editorial Board. The reliability of the proposed work and its significance should always be the basis of decision. The editor may be guided by the policies of the Editorial Board of the journal "Historical and socio-educational thought" constrained by such legal requirements regarding libel, copyright, legality and plagiarism.
The editor may confer with other members of the Editorial Board and members of the Editorial Board in making decisions about publication.
An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the Authors.
The editor and the Editorial Board of the journal "Historical and socio-educational thought" are required without the need to disclose information about the accepted manuscripts to all persons except the Authors, Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other scientific advisers, and the Publisher.
2.4. Disclosure and conflicts of interest
2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained through peer review, with possible benefits are kept confidential and not used for the purpose of personal gain.
2.4.2 Editors should recuse myself from reviewing manuscripts (namely: to request Co-editor, Assistant editor or to cooperate with other members of the Editorial Board in reviewing the work instead personal review and decision) in the case of a conflict of interest because of competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with Sponsors, companies and other institutions associated with the manuscript.
2.5. Supervision of publications
The editor, who provided convincing evidence that the allegations or the conclusions presented in the publication, erroneous, must inform the Publisher (and/or in relevant Scientific society) for the early notification of amendments, exemptions publication, expressions of concern and other related statements.
2.6. Involvement and cooperation in investigations
Editor in conjunction with the Publisher (or society) should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper. Such measures broadly include interaction with the Authors of the manuscript and the reasoning of the relevant claim, or demand, but can also involve interaction with relevant organizations and research centers.
3. Duties Of Reviewers
3.1. Impact on the decisions of the Editorial Board
Peer review assists the Editor in making a decision on publishing and through appropriate communications with the author may also assist the Author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method. The publisher shares the view of many that all scholars who wish to contribute to the publication, are required to perform substantial work on reviewing of the manuscript.
Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the manuscript or not having enough time for a quick run of work, must notify the Editor of the journal "Historical and socio-educational thought" and ask to be removed from the review process of the relevant manuscripts.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as a confidential document. This work could not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the Editor.
3.4. Requirements and objectivity
The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the Author is unacceptable. Reviewers should clearly and convincingly Express their opinions.
3.5. Acknowledgement of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work relevant to the theme and not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported in the manuscript must be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewer should also draw the Editor's attention to any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which in the field of scientific competence of the Reviewer.
3.6. Disclosure and conflicts of interest
3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained through peer review, with possible benefits are kept confidential and not used for the purpose of personal gain.
3.6.2. Reviewers should not participate in the consideration of manuscripts in the case of a conflict of interest because of competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies, or other organizations associated with the submitted work.
4. Duties Of Authors
4.1. Manuscript requirements
4.1.1 the Authors report on an original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as an objective discussion of the significance of the study. The data underlying the work should be correctly represented. The paper should contain sufficient detail and references for possible playback. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
4.1.2. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and Editorial 'opinion' works should be clearly marked.
4.2. Originality and plagiarism
4.2.1 Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and in the case of using the work or words of other Authors must provide appropriately cited or quoted.
4.2.2 Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from the view of someone else's work as an author before copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of other people's work (without attribution) and to the statements of their rights on the results of other research. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
4.3. Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication
4.3.1 In General, an Author should not publish the manuscript, mostly dealing with the same research in more than one journal of primary publication. The submission of the same manuscript simultaneously to more than one journal is perceived as unethical and unacceptable.
4.3.2. In General, an Author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
4.3.3. Publication of some kinds of articles in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable under certain conditions. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, presenting the same data and interpretation as in the originally published work.
The primary reference should be presented in the second publication. For further information on acceptable forms of secondary publication can be found on the page www.icmje.org.
4.4. Acknowledgement of sources
It is necessary to acknowledge the contribution of others. the Authors should cite publications that are relevant to the execution of the submitted work. The data obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, should not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as the evaluation of manuscripts or grants, should not be used without explicit written permission of the Authors relating to confidential sources.
4.5. Authorship publication
4.5.1 the Authors are to be persons who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as Co-authors. In cases where research participants have made a significant contribution in a certain field in a research project, they must be specified as individuals who have made significant contributions to this study.
4.5.2. The author must ensure that all participants who have made a significant contribution to the study presented as Co-authors and are not listed as Co-authors those who did not participate in the study that all Co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and have agreed to its submission for publication.
4.6. People, subjects
The manuscript must be clearly stated that from all the people that have become objects of study, written informed consent was obtained. It is always necessary to ensure the rights to inviolability of private life.
4.7. Disclosure and conflicts of interest
4.7.1 All Authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or conclusions presented in the work.
4.7.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest, necessarily be disclosed include employment, consultancy, stock ownership, royalties, provision of expert opinion, patent application or registration of a patent, grants and other financial security. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.
4.8. Fundamental errors in published works
In the case of an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the publication, the Author must inform the Editor of the journal "Historical and socio-educational thought"
and interact with the Editor for the early withdrawal of publication, or error correction. If the Editor or the Publisher has received information from a third party that the publication contains a significant error, the Author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct mistakes in the shortest possible time.
5. Duties Of The Publisher
5.1 the Publisher shall follow the principles and procedures that contribute to the realization of the ethical responsibilities of Editors
Reviewers and Authors of the journal "Historical and socio-educational thought"
in accordance with these requirements. The publisher should ensure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint did not affect editorial decisions.
5.2. The publisher should support the editors of the journal "Historical and socio-educational thought"
in the examination of claims to the ethical aspects of published materials and help to interact with other journals and/or Publishers, if it contributes to the performance of duties by the Editors.
5.3. The publisher should promote good practices research and implement industry standards in order to improve ethical recommendations, procedures, exemptions and fixes.
5.4 the Publisher should provide specialised legal review and counsel if necessary.
Section prepared according to the International Committee on publication ethics (COPE)
Fee for publication
Manuscripts graduate students are published free of charge in order of priority.
Disclosure and conflict of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not use for personal advantage.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they are personally interested in the result of competition, collaboration or other relationship with any of the authors, companies or institutions relevant to the article.
The subscription and distribution
Subscribe to the printed version of the magazine at the link-
Our subscription index: T (combined catalogue)